Based on the author's thesis (doctoral - University of Melbourne, Melbourne Law School, 2015) issued under title: Is Rawlsian libreralism compatible with Islam? : a case study of post-Soeharto Indonesia --Verso of title page.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Islam and pluralism -- Rawls and the challenge of faith -- Faith and freedom in Indonesian law -- MUI : the institutionalising of Indonesian islam -- Case study part 1 : the language of devotion -- Case study part 2 : innovation on trial -- Islam, public reason and the state.

This book draws on the work of Rawls to explore the interaction between faith, law and the right to religious freedom in post-Soeharto Indonesia, the world's largest democracy after India and the United States. It argues that enforcement of Islamic principles by the state is inconsistent with religious diversity and the country's liberal constitution. The book thus contributes to understanding the role of religion in the development of democracy in the world's largest Muslim nation. A key objective is to test the argument that Rawls' thinking about public reason cannot apply to the case of Indonesia, and Muslim states more broadly. The book therefore contributes to emerging scholarship that considers Rawls in a Muslim context. In addition to examining public reason in detail and considering critiques of the concept, the work highlights the fact that the theory was created to deal with value pluralism and is therefore relevant in any religious setting, including an Islamic one. In doing so, it emphasises that Islam is multifaceted and demonstrates the difficulties, and negative consequences, of integrating faith and law in a liberal state.

1 2