Corrupt research : the case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science / Raymond Hubbard, Drake University.
Material type:
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Female Library | Q172.5.E77 2016 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | 1 | Available | STACKS | 51952000191247 | |
![]() |
Main Library | Q172.5.E77 2016 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | 1 | Available | STACKS | 51952000191230 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 269-316) and index.
Introduction -- Philosophical orientation -- Significant difference -- Philosophical orientation -- Significant sameness -- The importance of replication research -- Significant sameness -- The importance of replication research -- Significant Difference -- Conception of generalization/external validity -- Contrasts over statistical issues -- Whither the academy? -- Epilogue.
Addressing the immensely important topic of research credibility, Raymond Hubbard's groundbreaking work proposes that we must treat such information with a healthy dose of skepticism. This book argues that the dominant model of knowledge procurement subscribed to in these areas - the significant difference paradigm - is philosophically suspect, methodologically impaired, and statistically broken. Hubbard introduces a more accurate, alternative framework - the significant sameness paradigm - for developing scientific knowledge. The majority of the book comprises a head-to-head comparison of the "significant difference" versus "significant sameness" conceptions of science across philosophical, methodological, and statistical perspectives. -- from back cover.
1 2
There are no comments on this title.