Ctrl + Z : the right to be forgotten / Meg Leta Jones.
Material type:
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Female Library | K3264.C65 .J66 2016 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | 1 | Available | STACKS | 51952000329299 | |
![]() |
Main Library | K3264.C65 .J66 2016 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | 1 | Available | STACKS | 51952000329282 |
Browsing Main Library shelves Close shelf browser
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
K3259 .L359 2017 Language rights / | K3260 .F665 2016 Food systems governance : challenges for justice, equality and human rights / | K3263 .B36 2015 Privacy on the ground : driving corporate behavior in the United States and Europe / | K3264.C65 .J66 2016 Ctrl + Z : the right to be forgotten / | K3278 .P75 2017 Privacy and power : a transatlantic dialogue in the shadow of the NSA-Affair / | K3280 .L392 2011 Law and religion in public life : the contemporary debate / | K346 .E46 2016 The emotional dynamics of law and legal discourse / |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-252) and index.
Forgetting made easy -- Forgetting made impossible -- Innovating privacy -- Digital information stewardship -- Ctrl + Z in legal cultures -- Ctrl + Z in the international community.
Also available as an e-book.
"This is going on your permanent record!" is a threat that has never held more weight than it does in the Internet Age, when information lasts indefinitely. The ability to make good on that threat is as democratized as posting a Tweet or making a blog. Data about us is created, shared, collected, analyzed, and processed at an overwhelming scale. The damage caused can be severe, affecting relationships, employment, academic success, and any number of other opportunities--and it can also be long lasting. One possible solution to this threat? A digital right to be forgotten, which would in turn create a legal duty to delete, hide, or anonymize information at the request of another user. The highly controversial right has been criticized as a repugnant affront to principles of expression and access, as unworkable as a technical measure, and as effective as trying to put the cat back in the bag. Ctrl+Z breaks down the debate and provides guidance for a way forward. It argues that the existing perspectives are too limited, offering easy forgetting or none at all. By looking at new theories of privacy and organizing the many potential applications of the right, law and technology scholar Meg Leta Jones offers a set of nuanced choices. To help us choose, she provides a digital information life cycle, reflects on particular legal cultures, and analyzes international interoperability. In the end, the right to be forgotten can be innovative, liberating, and globally viable--Publisher description.
1 2
There are no comments on this title.