Your cart is empty.
  • Home

    Justices and journalists : the global perspective / edited by Richard Davis, David Taras.

    Contributor(s): Davis, Richard, 1955- [editor.] | Taras, David, 1950- [editor.]Material type: TextTextPublisher: Cambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, [2017]Description: 1 online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 1108114202; 9781108114202Subject(s): Law in mass media | Mass media -- Law and legislation | Judges | LAW / Military | Judges | Law in mass media | Mass media -- Law and legislationGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Justices and journalists.DDC classification: 343.09/9 LOC classification: K487.M43 | J87 2017
    Contents:
    Cover; Half title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Judges and Journalists and the Spaces In Between; 1 Judicial Communication: (Re)Constructing Legitimacy in Argentina; 2 Communication beyond the Judgments: The Australian High Court, Speaking for Itself, but Not Tweeting; 3 Uncommon Transparency: The Supreme Court, Media Relations, and Public Opinion in Brazil; 4 The "Uncomfortable Embrace": The Supreme Court and the Media in Canada; 5 Germany: The Federal Constitutional Court and the Media
    6 The Supreme Court and Media in Ghana's Fourth Republic: An Analysis of Rulings and Interactions between Two Estates of the Realm7 The Puzzle of Judicial Communication in Indonesia: The Media, the Court, and the Chief Justice; 8 Carping, Criticizing, and Circumventing: Judges, the Supreme Court, and the Media in Israel; 9 Judicial Communication in South Korea: Moving toward a More Open System?; 10 Changing the Channel: Broadcasting Deliberations in the Mexican Supreme Court; 11 Norway: Managed Openness and Transparency
    12 Judicial Institutional Change and Court Communication Innovations: The Case of the UK Supreme Court13 Symbiosis: The US Supreme Court and the Journalists Who Cover It; Conclusion; Index
    Summary: A comparative approach to judicial communication offering perspectives on the relationship between national supreme courts and the media covering them.
    Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
        Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
    Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
    Books Books Female Library
    		K487.M43 .J87 2017 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) 1 Available STACKS 51952000213390
    Books Books Main Library
    		K487.M43 .J87 2017 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) 1 Available STACKS 51952000213406

    Includes bibliographical references and index.

    Print version record.

    Cover; Half title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Judges and Journalists and the Spaces In Between; 1 Judicial Communication: (Re)Constructing Legitimacy in Argentina; 2 Communication beyond the Judgments: The Australian High Court, Speaking for Itself, but Not Tweeting; 3 Uncommon Transparency: The Supreme Court, Media Relations, and Public Opinion in Brazil; 4 The "Uncomfortable Embrace": The Supreme Court and the Media in Canada; 5 Germany: The Federal Constitutional Court and the Media

    6 The Supreme Court and Media in Ghana's Fourth Republic: An Analysis of Rulings and Interactions between Two Estates of the Realm7 The Puzzle of Judicial Communication in Indonesia: The Media, the Court, and the Chief Justice; 8 Carping, Criticizing, and Circumventing: Judges, the Supreme Court, and the Media in Israel; 9 Judicial Communication in South Korea: Moving toward a More Open System?; 10 Changing the Channel: Broadcasting Deliberations in the Mexican Supreme Court; 11 Norway: Managed Openness and Transparency

    12 Judicial Institutional Change and Court Communication Innovations: The Case of the UK Supreme Court13 Symbiosis: The US Supreme Court and the Journalists Who Cover It; Conclusion; Index

    A comparative approach to judicial communication offering perspectives on the relationship between national supreme courts and the media covering them.

    1 2

    There are no comments on this title.

    to post a comment.